Some universities are working towards ambitious 2030 net zero targets, while others are aligned with the UK Government’s 2050 deadline. Even with an additional two decades, the scale of the challenge is formidable.
Many institutions have already published detailed, costed decarbonisation roadmaps and the price tag is significant. For many, the journey to net zero will come with a £100 million+ price tag. With over 160 universities in the UK, the overall sector requirement will run into the billions.
Progress, however, remains uneven across the sector. A small number of organisations invested early and are now approaching the finish line. Many more universities are still at the initial stages of decarbonisation, and the question I was asked most often at AUDE was a simple one: “Where should we start?”
Having worked with more than 20% of the UK’s universities, we’ve seen first hand the strategies, attitudes and behaviours that build real momentum on the journey to net zero.
The project is being delivered through the NDEE framework and comes with an energy performance contract, which guarantees certain key performance indicators, such as carbon reduction, will be met, providing the College with certainty that its new heating system will perform as promised.
We can’t overstate how impressed we’ve been by the universities that have invested time into developing robust decarbonisation plans. These documents become the blueprint for everything that follows and should be formed based on data collection and deep understanding of your Estate’s energy profiles and emissions.
A strong plan gives you a deep understanding of your energy infrastructure, how it performs, where it falls short, and where the most meaningful improvements can be made. It enables simple comparisons, such as the carbon and cost savings from replacing fluorescent lighting with LEDs, alongside more complex decisions, such as identifying the appropriate replacement for fossil‑fuelled heating and a reliance on the electricity grid.
By the end of the process, you’ll have a workable, evidence‑based roadmap, and crucially, clarity on whether you’re facing a £10 million challenge or a £100 million one.
No university reaches net zero through one flagship project. Even those securing headline‑grabbing £30m+ investments are only reducing their emissions by a proportion. Most institutions will need to deliver dozens of projects over the coming decades, from quick‑win energy‑reduction measures to major energy‑centre redevelopments or large‑scale renewable energy generation schemes.
Funding windows often appear quickly and close even faster. A strong decarbonisation plan helps you identify packages of work that meet a funder’s criteria, rather than waiting for funding that perfectly matches an ideal project.
Flexibility is key. If you can group and regroup initiatives in several ways, you dramatically increase your chances of being eligible for multiple funding opportunities. The universities that make the most progress are the ones able to move quickly and fluidly.
Energy‑conservation measures are often the first place universities turn, and for good reason. They reduce energy and carbon at source, are usually self‑funded, and can be delivered with minimal disruption or as part of maintenance works. They also help reduce overall energy demand, meaning future generation or electrification solutions can be smaller and more cost‑effective.
Funding schemes often include requirements such as £ per tonne of carbon reduction. By combining high‑impact measures such as Solar PV with less cost‑effective upgrades, such as glazing, you can build packages that meet each criteria whilst retaining a ‘fabric first’ approach to decarbonisation.
Your decarbonisation plan should give you a detailed understanding of each measure, enabling you to create funding‑ready bundles with confidence.
Once you’ve created your decarbonisation roadmap, it’s vital to socialise it. Many universities have made public commitments but delivering them requires strong internal political will and this can be difficult when competing for budget with student‑facing services.
The institutions making the fastest progress are those with a proactive approach to internal and external communication. Be vocal. Be visible. Advocate relentlessly for your decarbonisation agenda. Your work will only gain traction if internal enthusiasm matches the public commitments being made.
When competing for internal budget, you need to demonstrate the strategic value, and often the financial return of your initiatives. Sharing early wins is critical: use data to highlight impact, build confidence and secure support. One NHS estates manager told me that raising the internal profile of sustainability work was “one of the most important things you can do”.
Declaring a climate emergency or announcing a 2030 target only matters if you follow through. We’re proud to have partnered with many of the UK’s universities over multiple phases of decarbonisation projects and all our partners have one common trait – passionate people in their organisation who drive change and continue to achieve phased steps towards their net zero ambitions.
Your decarbonisation road map is an evolving document, and you don’t need to begin with a “set-in stone” list of priorities. Simply beginning the process can bring greater clarity, allowing you to get a better understanding of the potential phases.
Also, don’t let the size of your net zero challenge overwhelm you. Even the projects which have multiple projects under their belt didn’t have a full sequence of project and phases from day one. They created an overarching plan which could be adopted to suit available funding streams, access windows and the life cycle stages of existing infrastructure.
Once you have your basic plan, you can begin to build on it, crafting your long-term strategy over time.
